25.10.2015

Messages from a New America


    
    
October 25, 2015
10th Mercosul Biennial
Messages from a New America
October 23–December 6, 2015

www.fundacaobienal.art.br
The 10th Mercosul Biennial has opened to the public in Porto Alegre, Brazil, and runs from October 23 to  December 6. This edition of the biennial is dedicated exclusively to art from Latin America, searching for its roots and presenting a new curatorial model that goes against the grain by including works from the early 18th century to the present. Titled Messages from a New America, this large-scale exhibition seeks to break new ground on shifting the attention to innovative curatorial platforms for the art of Latin America. The 10th Mercosul Biennial is curated by art historian and curator Dr. Gaudêncio Fidelis (Brazil), Chief Curator Márcio Tavares (Brazil), Adjunct Curator, Assistant Curator Ana Zavadil (Brazil), and Educational Curator Cristián G. Gallegos (Chile).

The Biennial consists of seven major exhibitions, interconnected and built to encompass a number of issues concerning the art of the region, some of which are dealt with for the first time anywhere, such as smell and dust as material reality of the art objects. The exhibitions are: The Biography of Urban Life; Modernism in Parallax; Neobaroque Anthropophagy; Olfactory: Smell in Art; Body Apparatuses; Dust and the World of Objects; and Marginália of Form. The Biennial occupies several venues throughout the city of Porto Alegre, including the Rio Grande do Sul Museum of Art, Santander Cultural, Mercosul Museum of Human Rights, Usina do Gasômetro, CEEE Cultural Center, Acervo Independente, and InstitutoLing.

"This biennial represents a unique opportunity to view a vast range of work alongside each other and introduces a new model for exhibitions within a biennial context. It was created by choosing specific works, encompassing an extensive arc spanning from the historical to the contemporary. Instead of representing artists, we sought to highlight their artistic contributions related to specific issues," says Mr. Fidelis.

"This platform abandons the model of commissions that is typical of biennials and focused instead on searching for works that show the extraordinary field of aesthetics that appears throughout the historical trajectory of creativity that brings forth sources for innovation and creativity. The exhibition takes into account legibility, cultural specificity, historical priority and criticism of the Western canon, thereby reactivating, producing and circulating original knowledge about these works instead of just celebrating them."

The curatorial platform of the 10th Biennial includes canonical and non-canonical works, as well as works considered by the curators as "blind spots" due to a conspicuous absence from criticism, art history narratives and curatorial endeavors which have failed to take such works into account.

21.10.2015

Lady Sarah Forbes Bonetta Davies


Lady Sarah Forbes Bonetta Davies, photographed by Camille Silvy, 1862 Sarah Forbes Bonetta Davies was a child born into a royal West African dynasty. She was orphaned in 1848, when her parents were killed in a slave-hunting war. She was around five years old. In 1850, Sarah was taken to England and presented to Queen Victoria as a “gift” from the King of Dahomey. She became the queen’s goddaughter and a celebrity known for her extraordinary intelligence.

17.10.2015

Surinaemen ontmaskerd. Jan Willem de Man (1776)


Buku – Bibliotheca Surinamica
~ A blog about books on Suriname & more

17SaturdayOct 2015
Posted by Carl Haarnack in 18th century books, Dutch books, Law
≈ Comments Offon Surinaemen ontmaskerd. Jan Willem de Man (1776)

Surinaemen ontmaskerd, of Zakelyke beschouwing, waer aen het verval der colonie Surinaemen, thans Grotelyks toe te schryven is. Uit meest authenticque stukken bewyslyk, ten nutte der Nederlanderen aangetoond. Jan Willem Engelbert de Man. Amsterdam, Gedrukt voor rekening des aucteurs, en zyn te bekoomen, by J.A. Crajenschot [ca. 1776]


Hof van Justitie, Paramaribo (1830)

http://www.earlydutchbooksonline.nl/nl/edbo

11.10.2015

Review: The Many-Headed Hydra

An article from Do or Die Issue 10. In the paper edition, this article appears on page(s) 322-329.

Review: The Many-Headed Hydra

The Many-Headed Hydra:Sailors, Slaves, Commoners and the Hidden History of the Revolutionary Atlantic
By Peter Linebaugh and Marcus Rediker (Verso, 2000)
Hardback/433pp/£19/ISBN 1 85984 798 6
"Who are the oppressors but the Nobility and Gentry; and who are oppressed, if not the Yeoman, the Farmer, the Tradesman and the Labourer? ... your slavery is their liberty, your poverty is their prosperity; yea, in brief, your honouring of them, dishonoureth the commonality... Unlord those that are lorded by you."
- Ranter Laurence Clarkson, 1647 (p. 81)
The Many-Headed Hydra is a long awaited (almost 20 years in the making) tour-de-force of radical history from below. Avoiding the usual categories that constrain history within the limits of the nation state, the authors take an internationalist approach in order to study the way people have fought against these categories and have tried to escape from and resist states by moving across borders and organising across races.
Nowadays when globalisation is the buzzword most used to understand capitalism, it is worth remembering that capitalism has always been global. Linebaugh and Rediker make this point by referring to the Virginia Company - the origin of English imperialism - as a "new world-trade organization". (p. 15) This book is about the origins of capitalism in the first wave of globalisation in the 17th and 18th centuries and about the resistance that it encountered. At school we are taught about the great era of exploration and discovery - we are not taught about the slavery, genocide, and exploitation that it entailed, nor about the mutinies, slave revolts and runaway maroon communities of ex-slaves that resisted it.
The authors' contention is that the 'discovery' of the Americas signalled a new stage in human history. It kick-started capitalism, launched global maritime trade, created the biggest movement of peoples in history and transformed the world. They take this as their starting point and focus on the resistance to this new globalisation. They then follow the thread of this resistance and the twists and turns it makes up to the point which normal 'labour history' tends to take as its starting point.
Thus The Many-Headed Hydra is a book of Atlantic history - about the three-way traffic between Africa, America and Europe. Everyone is familiar with the famous triangular slave trade which built the fortunes of Bristol, Liverpool, Glasgow and London. But it is inevitable that not only slaves, sugar and tobacco travelled on the ships. News travelled too - underground news of slave revolts, of revolutions in Haiti, France and America; new ideas and new tactics. People travelled too - radicals who had stirred up trouble in England were transported overseas and spread their ideas, while travellers who had seen in the indigenous peoples of the Americas that a free life in harmony with nature was possible, brought their ideas back to Europe.
Linebaugh and Rediker use a few particular episodes and a few individual people to draw out a series of themes that permeate the whole book. They do this successively, using one telling episode to make a wide range of points. And they find a series of metaphors that recur throughout the historical period they're looking at. Chief among these is the myth of Hercules and the hydra, which was continually used by ruling class propagandists as a way of explaining the difficulty of their task of forging an empire. One of the twelve labours of Hercules was to slay the monstrous hydra, a snake-like beast with many heads. Every time he cut one off, another two grew in its place. He eventually killed it by using fire to seal the severed stumps, thus preventing the heads from regrowing. The Anglo-American ruling class saw themselves as Hercules trying to discipline rebellious subjects that would simply re-appear in new and more threatening forms every time they seemed to have conquered them. The building of empire was a 'Herculean' task and at every turn they were confronted by new manifestations of their amorphous enemy - pirates, rebellious slaves, independent women, religious radicals, 'war-like' tribal peoples... "the rabble", which "like a Monstrous Hydra" would "hiss against their Soveraigns Regal Power and Authority." (p. 29)

Enclosure

The history of the ruling-class Hercules' struggle with the hydra of resistance is driven by four central themes that determine the whole period covered in the book: enclosure, terror, co-operation and resistance, and the struggle for alternative ways of life.
The central thing that governs it all is enclosure or expropriation. It is the enclosure of common lands in England, beginning slowly in the late Middle Ages and then rapidly speeding up through to the mid-18th century that provides the essential historical basis for capitalism. To get the poor to work, you had to take away their land. Once the land was denied to the people, they had no choice but to work, making money for the owners of the plantations, ships and workshops. Huge numbers of displaced people were redeployed overseas to populate the colonies. The main argument advanced by the propagandists of English colonialism was that colonisation would provide a way for England to rid itself of the "swarmes of idle persons" enclosure had produced. (p. 16) The separation of the people from the land in England was mirrored overseas as the Irish were dispossessed, Africans enslaved and Native Americans displaced.
May Day 1640: At the outbreak of the English Revolution, 'prentices and seamen break open the prisons and storm the Archbishop of Canterbury's house in Lambeth.
Enclosure and the vast changes that were taking place in society (the beginnings of industrial exploitation, a huge military mobilisation) prompted massive and gloriously-named rebellions across the country as handicraft workers and peasants sought to preserve their old ways of life: the Beggars' Christmas Riot of 1582, the Plaisterers' Insurrection of 1586, the Felt-Makers' Riot of 1591, the Southwark Candle-Makers' Riot of 1592. Those who resisted enclosure, tearing down the fences and filling in the ditches were for the first time called Levellers.

Terror

This resistance to enclosure naturally imsplied a response: terror was used to make possible the basic conditions for capitalist development. At home, in the colonies and at sea, gruesome punishments were enacted to keep the poor at their work, prevent the spread of radical ideas and prevent colonists running off to join the enemy.
Transportation to the colonies was a punishment and one which not only kept the poor in their place but also profited the state, rather than costing it anything. The conquered Irish, as well as Gypsies and Africans were forcibly deported out of England. Thousands upon thousands of those found guilty of even minor crimes were transported to the colonies. In a sermon of 1622, John Donne promised that the Virginia Company would "sweep your streets, and wash your dores, from idle persons, and the children of idle persons, and imploy them: and truely, if the whole Countrey were such a Bridewell [prison], to force idle persons to work, it had a good use." (p. 59) As the authors point out, the propagandists and planners of colonisation wanted America to function as a prison.
However, it was not a prison from which escape was impossible. English soldiers and settlers in the new plantations in Ireland would regularly run away to join the Irish. And in the New World, settlers in England's Virginia colony refused to work, mutinied and "did Runne Away unto the Indyans". In 1611 some of these renegades were recaptured. Sir Thomas Dale, the governor of the colony "in A moste severe mannor caused [them] to be executed... Some he apointed to be hanged Some burned Some to be broken upon wheles, others to be staked and some to be shott to death." The purpose of this was "to terrefy the rest for Attemptinge the Lyke." (p. 34)

09.10.2015

Two centuries of slavery on Indonesian soil



On The Shelves
Linawati Sidarto, Contributor, Amsterdam | On The Shelves | Mon, October 05 2015, 4:08 PM



Tracing the history: Slaves by the water gate in Batavia by J. Rach, 1767.(Courtesy of Rijksmuseum Amsterdam)
On The Shelves News

BookWorm: Christian Sutardi: Shifting reading habits
Abolition of slavery
BookReviews: Rethinking the local, reappraising the global

While slavery in Dutch colonies in America is a known historical fact, hardly anyone is aware that up to a million people were bought, sold and had to endure slavery in Holland’s largest possession: Indonesia.
The slave Mono was regularly beaten by her owner. One day she could no longer stand the abuse and tried to run away.
Alas, she was captured. Her owner, seething with rage, tied her to a ladder, whipped and tortured her and left her for dead. Somehow, Mono was able to get hold of a knife and killed herself.
The above may sound like a scene from a Hollywood slavery movie, but it actually took place in Batavia in 1765, according to court archives belonging to the Dutch East India Company or Veerenigde Oost-Indische Compagnie (VOC).

Two books published this year in the Netherlands shed light on the widespread existence of slavery in the Indonesian archipelago during Dutch colonial rule.
“I became increasingly dismayed as I did my research: How was it possible that nobody had any idea about this dark history?” says Reggie Baay, author of Daar werd wat gruwelijks verricht: Slavernij in Nederlands-Indie (Gruesome things were committed there: Slavery in the Dutch East Indies).
The Netherlands started spreading its maritime wings in the late 16th century, dividing its global trading posts between the West Indian Company (WIC — West-Indische Compagnie), which overlooked its territories in the Americas and the VOC for Asia. The two companies came to be among the largest Atlantic slave traders between the 17th and the 19th centuries, shipping and trading hundreds of thousands of Africans to the Americas to work on plantations, including in the WIC territories of Surinam and the Antilles. Unknown to many, however, the Dutch were just as active in Asia.
Historian and writer Baay points out in his book that “from the beginning of their activities in Asia, the VOC bought, sold and used slaves.”
In his book Kleurrijke Tragiek: De geschiedenis van Slavernij in Azië onder de VOC (Colorful Tragedy: The history of slavery in Asia under the VOC), historian Matthias van Rossum recounts how VOC vicar Johann Christian Hoffman spoke of the dynamic trade carried out by Europeans and Asians in Batavia in the mid 17th century.
“The most important merchandise was slaves brought here from Ambon, Ternate, Bali, Borneo, Bengal, Madagascar and other countries, who were sold and resold on a daily basis,” Hoffman wrote in his journal.


Matthias van Rossum (Courtesy of Matthias van Rossum/Courtesy of Uitgeverij Verloren, Hilversum)

03.10.2015

Batig slot






Zie Neerland! hier uw droom, een net van ijzren wegen,
Gevlochten uit het goud van 't Indisch batig slot.
Maar ginds, uit Solo's oord, bralt u de bergstroom tegen,
Wiens bruischend golfgeklots uw ideaal bespot.
Spotprent uit het Humoristisch Album van 1861

Het batig slot was de winst die voortkwam uit het cultuurstelsel in Nederlands-Indië en ten goede kwam aan de Nederlandse schatkist. Het cultuurstelsel werd in 1830 door gouverneur-generaal Johannes van den Bosch ingevoerd met het idee dat Nederlands-Indië een wingewest was: Wat toch baat het bezit eener afgelegen kolonie ... indien zij aan de nationale welvaart geene geëvenredigde uitbreiding verschaft?.

Door toenemende bezuinigingen in Indië nam het batig slot gestadig toe. Volgens de grondwet van 1815 gold: de koning heeft bij uitsluiting het opperbestuur over de volkplantingen en bezittingen van het Rijk in andere werelddeelen. Daarmee kon deze besluiten wat er gebeurde met de Indische baten. In de periode 1830-1850 verscheen dan ook slechts een zesde deel daarvan als batig slot op de begroting. Zo betaalde koning Willem I de kosten voor de mobilisatie tijdens zijn volhardingspolitiek na de Belgische afscheiding van 1830 deels van de Indische baten. Vanaf 1840 maakte het batig slot deel uit van de grondwet, maar belangrijker was de grondwet van 1848 waarin de koning niet meer bij uitsluiting het opperbestuur van de koloniën had. Met de Indische comptabiliteitswet van 1864 die in 1867 in werking trad, kreeg het parlement de controle over het batig slot.

Het batig slot maakte uiteindelijk een substantieel deel uit van de totale staatsinkomsten:
1831-1840: 93 miljoen gulden
1841-1850: 141 miljoen gulden
1851-1860: 267 miljoen gulden
1861-1870: 224 miljoen gulden
1871-1877: 98 miljoen gulden

Voor 1850 maakte het batig slot gemiddeld 19% uit van de totale inkomsten. In de periode 1851-1860 was dit 31%, van 1861-1870 24% en tussen 1871-1877 13%. Tussen 1856 en 1865 kwam het zelfs zeven maal voor dat het batig slot ongeveer de helft van de staatsinkomsten uitmaakte.

Vanwege de onzekere hoogte van het batig slot werd hiermee aanvankelijk alleen de enorme staatsschuld afgelost. Daarna ging men minder terughoudend om met deze inkomsten en tijdens de economische opleving van de jaren vijftig van de negentiende eeuw begon men met het afschaffen van de accijnzen. Ook de invoering van inkomstenbelasting kon door het batig slot uitgesteld worden. Daarmee werden ook politieke verschuivingen voorkomen in het op censuskiesrecht gebaseerde stelsel. Met de spoorwegwet van 1860 werd het batig slot aangewend om het nationale spoorwegtracé uit te breiden. Ook voor de aanleg van het Noordzeekanaal en de Nieuwe Waterweg werd het batig slot gebruikt.
Kritiek

Aanvankelijk was het cultuurstelsel in Nederland algemeen aanvaard, maar vanaf de jaren veertig kwam er kritiek op onder meer de herendiensten en de gedwongen arbeid. Toen berichten van de in 1845 begonnen hongersnood op Java in 1849 doordrongen in Nederland, bracht dit kamerlid Van Hoëvell ertoe zijn landgenoten voor te houden in hoeverre zij tekort waren geschoten. Hoewel zijn rapport Slaven en vrijen onder de Nederlandsche wet er mede toe leidde dat in 1859 de slavernij uiteindelijk werd afgeschaft, bleef de batig slot-politiek van kracht. Het belang hiervan was voor de Nederlandse begroting juist in deze periode waarin een mogelijk staatsbankroet voorkomen werd te groot. Hoewel de Tweede Kamer in 1853 protesteerde tegen het gebruik van de term wingewest voor Java, bleef de kritiek in Nederland daardoor aanvankelijk nog beperkt. In Indië was er onder de Europese bevolking al wel een groeiende kritiek te horen.

De kritiek op het cultuurstelsel nam echter toe, ook omdat men meende dat er te weinig ruimte was voor particulier initiatief. Er was wel consensus dat Indië bij moest dragen aan de welvaart van het moederland, maar niet iedereen was meer onverschillig over de manier waarop het batig slot tot stand kwam. In de jaren zestig van de negentiende eeuw werd Indië pas echt een punt van discussie voor de volksvertegenwoordiging. Met de Suikerwet van 1870 werd de geleidelijke terugtrekking van het Nederlands-Indische gouvernement uit de suikercultuur geregeld, terwijl de Agrarische wet van datzelfde jaar het grondbezit van de inlandse bevolking waarborgde, terwijl woeste gronden in erfpacht mochten worden uitgegeven. Hiermee was een einde gekomen aan het cultuurstelsel. Tot 1877 was er nog sprake van een batig slot, maar door dalende koffieprijzen en de dure Atjehoorlog kwam hier een einde aan. Het eerdere argument om het gebruik van het batig slot voor Nederland te rechtvaardigen, namelijk dat van financiële eenheid tussen het moederland en Indië, ging nu niet meer op. De tekorten kwamen geheel op de Indische begroting terecht. Hoewel er na deze tijd geen sprake meer was van een batig slot, bleef deze post tot 1912 wel op de begroting staan. Indirect bleven de cultures en de handel op Indië van groot belang voor de Nederlandse welvaart.
Ereschuld

Aanvankelijk leek de liberalisering gunstig voor de Javanen, maar hun beperkte beschikking over kapitaal om de benodigde investeringen te kunnen doen, zorgde ervoor dat zij niet konden concurreren met de Europeanen. Van Deventer pleitte er in 1899 in het artikel "Een Eereschuld" in De Gids om de sinds de invoering van de Indische comptabiliteitswet in 1867 genoten batige saldo's van bij elkaar 187 miljoen gulden terug te betalen aan Indië. Hoewel dit stuk grote indruk maakte, is het nooit zover gekomen. Door minister Idenburg werd in 1905 wel een Indische schuld van 40 miljoen gulden overgenomen. Rond deze periode begon ook de ethische politiek, waarvan de doelstelling was de koloniale bevolking zodanig te vormen dat zij zou kunnen komen tot politieke en economische zelfstandigheid. Ook hierin bleef echter altijd het eigenbelang een belangrijke rol spelen voor het moederland.
Literatuur
Blok, D.P. (red) et al (1977-1983): Algemene Geschiedenis der Nederlanden, Fibula-Van Dishoeck, Haarlem,
Jong, J. de (1989): Van batig slot naar ereschuld. De discussie over de financiële verhouding tussen Nederland en Indië en de hervorming van de Nederlandse koloniale politiek 1860-1900, SDU, Den Haag.

branqueamento


The painting "The Redemption of Ham" by Modesto Brocos features a black grandmother, mixed-race mother, white father and white baby. The grandmother stands to the left with her hands raised in prayer, praising God that her grandson is white.